Full Disclosure: If the animal maps never, ever change (even though it might be done subtly, coherently, consistently, logically, and sparingly - and only once a year) I'll still be here, but I'll always be a little bored. And yeah, I know, it's my own fault. Believe me I know.
OK, I'M JUST GOING TO SPIT-BALL NOW, SO PUT AWAY YOUR SHOTTY'S....
HooCairs wrote:
I believe random animal spawn would be bad for many reasons:
- stand setups would be pointless - only if they were randomized every time a game started - no one wants this.
- we have no scouting & finding phase - if it only happened once a year, we would start each new season with a finding phase.
- hard to bind casual players - again, only if it were random every time.
- not only spawn maps would have to be changed (or deleted) but also interest/need maps - probably, but perhaps the maps would only have to be slightly modified to still be useful - if not quite so defined.
- animals could occur in the wrong places, like bighorn sheep in the valley - well, you're reaching here, but ok, it could become an issue. But how many animals in this game need to be absolutely confined to one area?... IRL, not bighorns, not by a long shot; maybe ibex.
I'm afraid to ask, but I'm just wondering: isn't everybody just a little bored, knowing where every animal is going to be from now on, forever? I know SOME are really bored, like myself, but isn't EVERYBODY? just a little tiny bit? "Rinse and repeat" and all that? C'mon Hoo, you know you are, you KNOW you are....
I sympathize with static hunters, I get it, but I'm not a static hunter even though I have a lot of towers. I also sympathize with the fast travel and short duration hunters. But I'm an IRL hunter, so I just do not enjoy unrealistically short hunts. I like walking, a lot. And man I'm BORED with knowing which animal is going to call next. Literally!!! I would really like a little more variety, and lately, on WHI, it just felt like a breath of fresh air.
Is there no way to make this change possible without alienating the majority of players? Isn't there one decent, comprehensive compromise out there that one of us can come up with, which will improve the game without ruining it? Hopefully there is, but maybe not. If not, as I said before, I defer to the bottom line, and to the majority; because I still absolutely love this game. Absolutely.