Hynu wrote:To be honest that's just simply toxic and all this crap chat is not really relevant at all. How about we wait and see. The negativity will kill this game, not EW.Anita Ruling wrote:Please cite one example where EW has ever planned anything in the last year and a half that went well. Just one, please. And that was with full staff of "experts" and the full support of Avalanche and Nordick.Skybird wrote:Just imagine, imagine for a moment only, that they planned something better than many of you assume - must they not be be completely pi$$ed then when reading how fanatically many of you guys here try to imply they have only the meaniest and most malicious of intentions...?
And now you say imagine if they planned something better. I'm laughing out loud.
well it is relevant, EW do have a proven track record of having issues with big updates, changes and releases. this is gona be arguably the biggest change yet so its a case of history vs blind optimism. hes not being toxic hes being realistic
all he asks for 1 example and thats a fair ask. frankly to do such a big change to the membership model it requires a tone of little changes that will make a big difference. and the company focus has clearly not been on classic for some months now. its probably going to go brilliantly