So you wouldn't mind them saying "there is a game update today, and we fixed some bugs, made some models look better, tweaked the some animal AI to get it and continue playing please click on the pay button and complete the transaction"?stancomputerhunter wrote:Yes there is, if it's monetized.DHRifleman wrote:There is no profit in improving what is already created, only additions will add increased revenue. Membership alone may support the servers, but without a profit there is no reason to do that.stancomputerhunter wrote:
Not any more it isn't. It's centered on attracting the me generation and instant gratification generation, and neither have any thing to do with hunting. It is just the conduit.
I've been playing this game for 5 years, and I would be perfectly happy if they never developed it further than the day I started. Because then..it was a hunting game, and a hunting game only. Who cares about 40+ species, 12 reserves, all of the other junk they have dumped on the servers. The game, maintained, would still be just fine if they just enhanced the GAME PLAY only. Fix the bugs. Enhance the experience of playing a hunting game, not by more stuff, but by making what they have better. There were plenty of animals, plenty of reserves 5 years ago. They didn't have to add anything. They were making money, or they wouldn't have been in business.
Or "due to EW no longer adding to the game and only fixing bugs, and improving on what is already in the game the cost of membership is now $50 for 3 months, $90 for 6 Months, and $150 per year"?
I would rather them create things others will pay for that I don't care about, or things I do to help fund bug fixes and general improvements giving me the choice of what I spend to keep playing.