I just tested 3 games in 1440p 60Hz (DSR) all Ultra Settings:Fletchette wrote:I'd guess that's right.....If I turn off one of my 980's, and play with just one, with all settings maxed in Classic, I still get 60+ FPS at 1440p. Since a 1060 is fairly close to a 980, I'd say that's a fair comparison. I've haven't played COTW.Ludante wrote:Thank you, if I understand correctly GTX 1060 should be enough for 1440p theHunter Classic but for COTW or BF1 I would need GTX 1070 or higher?Fletchette wrote: 1080p (1920x1080) has 2073600 pixels.
1440p (2560x1440) has 3686400 pixels.
So 1440p (2K) has 1612800 more pixels (about 78%), than 1080p.
So it takes quite a bit more GPU power to achieve the same FPS. This isn't an exact methodology, but it's in the ballpark.
One way to make up for the lower FPS is that you can usually lower the AA with the higher resolution monitor, because it has so much sharper definition natively.
- COTW, average 34FPS (usually 45FPS in 1080p), and I HAVE TO SAY that graphics look 2x better than in 1080p, there were no sparkly and flickery trees any more, I think this game is not optimized for 1080p at all.
- Playersunknown Battlegrounds which have graphics issues because it is early release, 32FPS (usually 45-50FPS in 1080p) average, graphics also look 2x better than in 1080p
- BF1, average 52FPS (60-80FPS in 1080p) on Ultra settings in close combat (They shall not pass). Very smooth and fluid gameplay.