suggestion | full editor
- jpm1
- Outfitter
- Posts: 2605
- Joined: April 5th, 2014, 8:04 pm
- Location: Dordogne
- Contact:
suggestion | full editor
i think the full editor set by default in forums would be a wise choice
- Knut
- Outfitter
- Posts: 4847
- Joined: May 25th, 2012, 12:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: suggestion | full editor
Or even better: have a quick reply option with the most commonly used function buttons. Like type formatting, IMG- and URL tags.
“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'" ― Isaac Asimov
-
- Master Hunter
- Posts: 9404
- Joined: December 10th, 2011, 7:26 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: suggestion | full editor
+1Knut wrote:Or even better: have a quick reply option with the most commonly used function buttons. Like type formatting, IMG- and URL tags.
Feedback on my work as a moderator is always welcome!
- jpm1
- Outfitter
- Posts: 2605
- Joined: April 5th, 2014, 8:04 pm
- Location: Dordogne
- Contact:
- Alena Rybik
- EW Staff
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: January 7th, 2014, 6:31 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: suggestion | full editor
How about removing the Quick reply option? How many of you actually use it?
- BucksNBuffalo
- Master Hunter
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: December 3rd, 2008, 3:48 am
- Location: Buffalo, NY
- Contact:
Re: suggestion | full editor
I use it, but if it'll help overall, it can be removed. It's not a necessity and it's not like there would be no way to reply anymore lol.Alena Rybik wrote:How about removing the Quick reply option? How many of you actually use it?
- Knut
- Outfitter
- Posts: 4847
- Joined: May 25th, 2012, 12:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: suggestion | full editor
That'd mean to throwout the baby with the water in my eyes!Alena Rybik wrote:How about removing the Quick reply option? How many of you actually use it?
I use that frequently and would rather have no change than that being removed.
Because what would anyone gain by removing it? You would be forced to open the full editor every time. But one can do that already when wanted. It'd be the same click of a button andloading of a page as now. No gain in functionality at all.
“Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'" ― Isaac Asimov
- Tod1d
- Lead Moderator
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: June 29th, 2012, 7:13 pm
- Location: 42.655701 N, 82.61936 W
- Contact:
Re: suggestion | full editor
<nod> I use it (quick reply) all the time. The only time I use the full editor is if I need the extra controls (formatting, colors, urls etc...)
It's "Tod", with one bloody 'd'!
- DriftPrize
- Hunter
- Posts: 643
- Joined: January 18th, 2014, 2:09 pm
- Location: SEA
- Contact:
Re: suggestion | full editor
Same as using reply function and all the options popping up? I think it's efficient.jpm1 wrote:i think the full editor set by default in forums would be a wise choice
- jpm1
- Outfitter
- Posts: 2605
- Joined: April 5th, 2014, 8:04 pm
- Location: Dordogne
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest