gas56 wrote:rhapsodaisical wrote: I love the ethics in this game.
What ethics are you talking about in this game?
Just catching up on this thread...scrolling, scrolling, then I read that 1st part & couldn't wait to add.... Gas beat me to it.....
rhapsodaisical wrote:I mean that this game doesn't use "any gun" on anything that moves. EW does seem to consider species/weapon balances carefully. More than any other game I have played.
Sure they consider game balance on the weapons,.. how else would they sell them if they could shoot everything,... you would only need 2 guns and a bow.
And I never compared it to real life afaik.
_dfad_ wrote:It would be nice just to make elephants and rhinos unhuntable. So they exist in the game, walk around, can attack you, but a hunter is not allowed to shoot even on attacking animal.
ronMctube wrote:i think africa should of been done many a year ago. the risk finincially must of been seen too much of a risk to do so. pim did a article explaining about in a interview saying there would be no africa.the interview is no longer available for whatever reasons.
the way you handle adding africa and what you add if done right would of been fine. i cant see it coming to classic. the time to make it do it justice and the animals 6-9 month for the reserve. 3-6 months per new animal. cant see classic being around for that amount of time. 4 or 5 animals + one reserve. unless avalanche helped and they busy on multiple titles.
think its just one of those things that should of been done but never happened for classic.shame. the most wanted reserve since the game was made/released.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest