Next Gen Mini Comp # 25 by BCKidd
- splainin2do
- Outfitter
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: June 9th, 2019, 1:24 am
- Location: MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Next Gen Mini Comp # 25 by BCKidd
Ack! No one mentioned this yet, but I just caught it....
BCKidd - for the third sitka scoring... did you mean:
((Score + Weight in lbs.) x Harvest Value %)
example: (70 score + 80 lbs = 150) x 90% HV = 135
or, per "order of operations", where multiplication is supposed to be done before addition, but after things in parentheses
(Score + (Weight in lbs. x Harvest Value %))
example: 70 score + (80 lbs x 90% HV = 72) = 145
This won't matter much for a 100% HV... but if it's not a perfect shot, it might.
BCKidd - for the third sitka scoring... did you mean:
((Score + Weight in lbs.) x Harvest Value %)
example: (70 score + 80 lbs = 150) x 90% HV = 135
or, per "order of operations", where multiplication is supposed to be done before addition, but after things in parentheses
(Score + (Weight in lbs. x Harvest Value %))
example: 70 score + (80 lbs x 90% HV = 72) = 145
This won't matter much for a 100% HV... but if it's not a perfect shot, it might.
Working 2 jobs doesn't leave enough time for hunting!
"...but catching you is going to be impossible." Radamus
"...but catching you is going to be impossible." Radamus
- Faultier
- Hunter
- Posts: 870
- Joined: April 24th, 2018, 12:19 pm
- Contact:
Re: Next Gen Mini Comp # 25 by BCKidd
Sounds FunBCKidd wrote: Well, essentially, they wouldn't be a team per' se- but more like competitors from that side of things. Everyone, including the Forum Community Comp competitors, would be in it for themselves. No "teams", jus, a bunch of competitors from two different schools, trying to kick each others derrière's. I'd be trying to kick even the mini-comp competitors butts, as well as the EW Community League's butts. Indeed it would be epic! So, we could call it an "Invitational", as opposed to a team comp. If that makes sense. Respect,
BCKidd.
Looking forward for more info on this.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Attempt 1 : https://www.thehunter.com/#profile/_fau ... /110826872 DQ'ed. hit an invisible pile of snow
Attempt 2 : https://www.thehunter.com/#profile/_fau ... /110827463
Sitka Deer: (186.7 lbs (+) 100) B&C Scoresheet link:https://www.thehunter.com/#profile/_fau ... /874910097
(+)
Sitka Deer: (81.4957 (+) 100) B&C Scoresheet link:https://www.thehunter.com/#profile/_fau ... /874908569
(+)
Sitka Deer: (98.3071 (+) 191.7 lbs (x) 100 %) B&C Scoresheet link: https://www.thehunter.com/#profile/_fau ... /874899992
____________________________________
CTS = 758,2028
not sure if i got the scoring right there
hope i can improve the numbers, but i hardly doubt it will be much better
good luck everyone
Stats
Spoiler:
- BCKidd
- Moderator
- Posts: 16548
- Joined: January 6th, 2012, 2:15 am
- Location: British Columbia
- Contact:
Re: Next Gen Mini Comp # 25 by BCKidd
Yes. Score plus weight in pounds (X) Harvest Value. So you'd add the score and weight then (X) it by HV %. Are you tryin' to make things complicated again... Respect,splainin2do wrote:Ack! No one mentioned this yet, but I just caught it....
BCKidd - for the third sitka scoring... did you mean:
((Score + Weight in lbs.) x Harvest Value %)
example: (70 score + 80 lbs = 150) x 90% HV = 135
or, per "order of operations", where multiplication is supposed to be done before addition, but after things in parentheses
(Score + (Weight in lbs. x Harvest Value %))
example: 70 score + (80 lbs x 90% HV = 72) = 145
This won't matter much for a 100% HV... but if it's not a perfect shot, it might.
BCKidd.
"Patience and perseverance, are not an option if you want that trophy, they are a necessity."
Keep it real!
"Careful, David, he's Canadian......They eat people you know." Fletchette.
- BCKidd
- Moderator
- Posts: 16548
- Joined: January 6th, 2012, 2:15 am
- Location: British Columbia
- Contact:
Re: Next Gen Mini Comp # 25 by BCKidd
The third Sitka, you did it exactly how it should be done. Respectfully,Faultier wrote: not sure if i got the scoring right there
hope i can improve the numbers, but i hardly doubt it will be much better
good luck everyone
BCKidd.
"Patience and perseverance, are not an option if you want that trophy, they are a necessity."
Keep it real!
"Careful, David, he's Canadian......They eat people you know." Fletchette.
- BCKidd
- Moderator
- Posts: 16548
- Joined: January 6th, 2012, 2:15 am
- Location: British Columbia
- Contact:
Re: Next Gen Mini Comp # 25 by BCKidd
Attempt 1.
Complete hunt: https://www.thehunter.com/#profile/bcki ... /110827049 No Submission.
On my first attempt- I saw no Sitka worth bullets. Which is weird, considering the night before the comp started I found some nice ones. Respect,
BCKidd.
Complete hunt: https://www.thehunter.com/#profile/bcki ... /110827049 No Submission.
On my first attempt- I saw no Sitka worth bullets. Which is weird, considering the night before the comp started I found some nice ones. Respect,
BCKidd.
"Patience and perseverance, are not an option if you want that trophy, they are a necessity."
Keep it real!
"Careful, David, he's Canadian......They eat people you know." Fletchette.
- splainin2do
- Outfitter
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: June 9th, 2019, 1:24 am
- Location: MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Next Gen Mini Comp # 25 by BCKidd
Who, ME???BCKidd wrote:Yes. Score plus weight in pounds (X) Harvest Value. So you'd add the score and weight then (X) it by HV %. Are you tryin' to make things complicated again... Respect,splainin2do wrote:...BCKidd - for the third sitka scoring... did you mean:
((Score + Weight in lbs.) x Harvest Value %)
example: (70 score + 80 lbs = 150) x 90% HV = 135
BCKidd.
[bigimg]https://i.postimg.cc/vT978Bjr/i-would-never-do-something-like-that-pinocchio.gif[/bigimg]
Working 2 jobs doesn't leave enough time for hunting!
"...but catching you is going to be impossible." Radamus
"...but catching you is going to be impossible." Radamus
- BCKidd
- Moderator
- Posts: 16548
- Joined: January 6th, 2012, 2:15 am
- Location: British Columbia
- Contact:
Re: Next Gen Mini Comp # 25 by BCKidd
Man, where do you come up with those things. For the third Sitka add the score and weight in lbs, then multiply (x) it by HV%. That seems pretty straightforward, doesn't it? Unless of course you're a mathematical mad scientist. Respect,
BCKidd.
BCKidd.
"Patience and perseverance, are not an option if you want that trophy, they are a necessity."
Keep it real!
"Careful, David, he's Canadian......They eat people you know." Fletchette.
- Fletchette
- Trophy Hunter
- Posts: 7319
- Joined: September 10th, 2013, 8:30 pm
- Location: Missouri, USA
- Contact:
Re: Next Gen Mini Comp # 25 by BCKidd
You're correct of course, the ROE should probably be corrected.....PEMDASsplainin2do wrote:Who, ME???
- splainin2do
- Outfitter
- Posts: 4170
- Joined: June 9th, 2019, 1:24 am
- Location: MA, USA
- Contact:
Re: Next Gen Mini Comp # 25 by BCKidd
[bigimg]https://i.postimg.cc/ZqRQLG0G/confused-math-lady.gif[/bigimg]BCKidd wrote: Man, where do you come up with those things. For the third Sitka add the score and weight in lbs, then multiply (x) it by HV%. That seems pretty straightforward, doesn't it? Unless of course you're a mathematical mad scientist. Respect,
BCKidd.
Thank you, Fletchette.Fletchette wrote:You're correct of course, the ROE should probably be corrected.....PEMDASsplainin2do wrote:Who, ME???
Perhaps it's a Canadian thing? Our pastor is from Canada and would ALWAYS mess up a song we did, as he would mess up the counts of the beat. We even made a song teasing him about that one year! Part of the introduction to it was "Can Canadians count to six?"
Working 2 jobs doesn't leave enough time for hunting!
"...but catching you is going to be impossible." Radamus
"...but catching you is going to be impossible." Radamus
- BCKidd
- Moderator
- Posts: 16548
- Joined: January 6th, 2012, 2:15 am
- Location: British Columbia
- Contact:
Re: Next Gen Mini Comp # 25 by BCKidd
What, because one ( is missing math scientists can't figure it out... . Post here how you'd like to see it, and I'll fix it, wouldn't want folks wondering how to do the scoring of the third Sitka. Silly math folk. Respectfully,Fletchette wrote:You're correct of course, the ROE should probably be corrected.....PEMDASsplainin2do wrote:Who, ME???
BCKidd.
"Patience and perseverance, are not an option if you want that trophy, they are a necessity."
Keep it real!
"Careful, David, he's Canadian......They eat people you know." Fletchette.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: fon_Belkrofft_DK, LatinJoker69, Lucky, xOEDragonx and 1 guest