Next Gen Mini Comp # 25 by BCKidd

[splainin2do]

Ack! No one mentioned this yet, but I just caught it....
BCKidd - for the third sitka scoring... did you mean:

((Score + Weight in lbs.) x Harvest Value %)
example: (70 score + 80 lbs = 150) x 90% HV = 135

or, per "order of operations", where multiplication is supposed to be done before addition, but after things in parentheses

(Score + (Weight in lbs. x Harvest Value %))
example: 70 score + (80 lbs x 90% HV = 72) = 145

This won't matter much for a 100% HV... but if it's not a perfect shot, it might.

[Faultier]

Well, essentially, they wouldn't be a team per' se- but more like competitors from that side of things. Everyone, including the Forum Community Comp competitors, would be in it for themselves. No "teams", jus, a bunch of competitors from two different schools, trying to kick each others derrière's. I'd be trying to kick even the mini-comp competitors butts, as well as the EW Community League's butts. Indeed it would be epic! So, we could call it an "Invitational", as opposed to a team comp. If that makes sense. Respect,

BCKidd.

Sounds Fun
Looking forward for more info on this.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attempt 1 : https://www.thehunter.com/#profile/_fau ... /110826872 DQ'ed. hit an invisible pile of snow
Attempt 2 : https://www.thehunter.com/#profile/_fau ... /110827463

Sitka Deer: (186.7 lbs (+) 100) B&C Scoresheet link:https://www.thehunter.com/#profile/_fau ... /874910097
(+)
Sitka Deer: (81.4957 (+) 100) B&C Scoresheet link:https://www.thehunter.com/#profile/_fau ... /874908569
(+)
Sitka Deer: (98.3071 (+) 191.7 lbs (x) 100 %) B&C Scoresheet link: https://www.thehunter.com/#profile/_fau ... /874899992
____________________________________
CTS = 758,2028

not sure if i got the scoring right there
hope i can improve the numbers, but i hardly doubt it will be much better
good luck everyone

[BCKidd]

Ack! No one mentioned this yet, but I just caught it....
BCKidd - for the third sitka scoring... did you mean:

((Score + Weight in lbs.) x Harvest Value %)
example: (70 score + 80 lbs = 150) x 90% HV = 135

or, per "order of operations", where multiplication is supposed to be done before addition, but after things in parentheses

(Score + (Weight in lbs. x Harvest Value %))
example: 70 score + (80 lbs x 90% HV = 72) = 145

This won't matter much for a 100% HV... but if it's not a perfect shot, it might.

Yes. Score plus weight in pounds (X) Harvest Value. So you'd add the score and weight then (X) it by HV %. Are you tryin' to make things complicated again... Respect,

BCKidd.

[BCKidd]

not sure if i got the scoring right there
hope i can improve the numbers, but i hardly doubt it will be much better
good luck everyone

The third Sitka, you did it exactly how it should be done. Respectfully,

BCKidd.

[BCKidd]

Attempt 1.
Complete hunt: https://www.thehunter.com/#profile/bcki ... /110827049 No Submission.

On my first attempt- I saw no Sitka worth bullets. Which is weird, considering the night before the comp started I found some nice ones. Respect,

BCKidd.

[splainin2do]

...BCKidd - for the third sitka scoring... did you mean:

((Score + Weight in lbs.) x Harvest Value %)
example: (70 score + 80 lbs = 150) x 90% HV = 135

Yes. Score plus weight in pounds (X) Harvest Value. So you'd add the score and weight then (X) it by HV %. Are you tryin' to make things complicated again... Respect,

BCKidd.

Who, ME???
[bigimg]https://i.postimg.cc/vT978Bjr/i-would-never-do-something-like-that-pinocchio.gif[/bigimg]

[BCKidd]

Man, where do you come up with those things. For the third Sitka add the score and weight in lbs, then multiply (x) it by HV%. That seems pretty straightforward, doesn't it? Unless of course you're a mathematical mad scientist. Respect,

BCKidd.

[Fletchette]

Who, ME???

You're correct of course, the ROE should probably be corrected.....PEMDAS

[splainin2do]

Man, where do you come up with those things. For the third Sitka add the score and weight in lbs, then multiply (x) it by HV%. That seems pretty straightforward, doesn't it? Unless of course you're a mathematical mad scientist. Respect,

BCKidd.

[bigimg]https://i.postimg.cc/ZqRQLG0G/confused-math-lady.gif[/bigimg]

Who, ME???

You're correct of course, the ROE should probably be corrected.....PEMDAS

Thank you, Fletchette.
Perhaps it's a Canadian thing? Our pastor is from Canada and would ALWAYS mess up a song we did, as he would mess up the counts of the beat. We even made a song teasing him about that one year! Part of the introduction to it was "Can Canadians count to six?"

[BCKidd]

Who, ME???

You're correct of course, the ROE should probably be corrected.....PEMDAS

What, because one ( is missing math scientists can't figure it out... . Post here how you'd like to see it, and I'll fix it, wouldn't want folks wondering how to do the scoring of the third Sitka. Silly math folk. Respectfully,

BCKidd.