Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner

The latest news and announcements about theHunter provided by the developers

Who won in the Great Debate: Realism vs. Fun?

Poll ended at July 1st, 2015, 8:16 am

Knut
107
72%
TundraPuppy
42
28%
 
Total votes: 149
User avatar
Alena Rybik
EW Staff
EW Staff
Posts: 4643
Joined: January 7th, 2014, 6:31 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner

Post by Alena Rybik »

Pratze wrote:Actually this way no winner can be declared.

I have to post for Knut because realism is important for me. If I don't vote for Knut I am basically saying "i don't care for realism". I also say "I don't care about fun" which is very against what I want to vote for. If I vote for TundraPuppy I am saying "I don't care about realism" which I would never want to be quoted on and "It's all about the fun" (which would perfectly fit on good ballanced realism) but can't be voted because its in the wrong context.
As I wrote in my OP, "we're determining the winner of the debate, NOT the winning concept. Pick the one who you think managed to present his arguments in the best and most argumentative way." ;)
User avatar
Pratze
Outfitter
Posts: 2050
Joined: December 8th, 2009, 5:56 am
Contact:

Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner

Post by Pratze »

Alena Rybik wrote:
Pratze wrote:Actually this way no winner can be declared.

I have to post for Knut because realism is important for me. If I don't vote for Knut I am basically saying "i don't care for realism". I also say "I don't care about fun" which is very against what I want to vote for. If I vote for TundraPuppy I am saying "I don't care about realism" which I would never want to be quoted on and "It's all about the fun" (which would perfectly fit on good ballanced realism) but can't be voted because its in the wrong context.
As I wrote in my OP, "we're determining the winner of the debate, NOT the winning concept. Pick the one who you think managed to present his arguments in the best and most argumentative way."
yes I forgot about that when posting. I voted for Knut because I think he did a better job of backing his arguments. But I have to say TundraPuppy did an awsome job as well. It was pretty close!
User avatar
polihunter
Newbie
Posts: 13
Joined: September 22nd, 2013, 9:14 pm
Location: Spain
Contact:

Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner

Post by polihunter »

Mi voto siempre para el realismo, pero también puede ir acompañado de diversión. Caza realismo con diversión, para eso es un juego.
User avatar
BCKidd
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 16557
Joined: January 6th, 2012, 2:15 am
Location: British Columbia
Contact:

Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner

Post by BCKidd »

Knut really hit it on the head- my vote is for him. His arguments were concise and well thought out. ;) Peace.

BCKidd.


"Patience and perseverance, are not an option if you want that trophy, they are a necessity."

Keep it real!
"Careful, David, he's Canadian......They eat people you know." Fletchette.
User avatar
RayJRabbit
Tracker
Posts: 151
Joined: February 14th, 2015, 7:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner

Post by RayJRabbit »

How about this. Instead of changing the game, add a camo set that is legendary scent, sight and sound reduction vs all species for those who want the "fun" aspect. Those who want to stay true to real hunting have no need to buy it.
User avatar
Dukkers
Scout
Posts: 424
Joined: August 30th, 2014, 3:28 pm
Contact:

Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner

Post by Dukkers »

Been busy in the real world and gone for a while. But God Mode Gear? Have to be careful with the comps then otherwise ok. Both sides did well but I think Knut edged out Tundra Puppy. Now to get a quick hunt in before I have to start building another website for a restaurant.
User avatar
jpm1
Outfitter
Posts: 2605
Joined: April 5th, 2014, 8:04 pm
Location: Dordogne
Contact:

Post by jpm1 »

i didn't follow that debate as i didn't understand the concept of taking 2 guys (that i respect) and let them speak for thousands . i don't want to be OT but i think that as a game TH can't be nor too realistic nor too arcade . so , i won't vote , i just love the game as it is right now :D
Image
User avatar
Urgia
Scout
Posts: 416
Joined: November 8th, 2013, 7:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner

Post by Urgia »

I smell difficulty levels implementation.

Time to give hardcore players their due.
User avatar
Dillion1111
Scout
Posts: 456
Joined: August 1st, 2014, 12:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner

Post by Dillion1111 »

I voted for realism,

The game is too phony when you can shoot whole herds of animals with no effort.
User avatar
jpm1
Outfitter
Posts: 2605
Joined: April 5th, 2014, 8:04 pm
Location: Dordogne
Contact:

Post by jpm1 »

if you want realism that means 1 or 2 animals per hunting session . the game is nice like it is right now
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Latest News & Announcements”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest