As I wrote in my OP, "we're determining the winner of the debate, NOT the winning concept. Pick the one who you think managed to present his arguments in the best and most argumentative way."Pratze wrote:Actually this way no winner can be declared.
I have to post for Knut because realism is important for me. If I don't vote for Knut I am basically saying "i don't care for realism". I also say "I don't care about fun" which is very against what I want to vote for. If I vote for TundraPuppy I am saying "I don't care about realism" which I would never want to be quoted on and "It's all about the fun" (which would perfectly fit on good ballanced realism) but can't be voted because its in the wrong context.
Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner
- Alena Rybik
- EW Staff
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: January 7th, 2014, 6:31 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner
- Pratze
- Outfitter
- Posts: 2050
- Joined: December 8th, 2009, 5:56 am
- Contact:
Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner
yes I forgot about that when posting. I voted for Knut because I think he did a better job of backing his arguments. But I have to say TundraPuppy did an awsome job as well. It was pretty close!Alena Rybik wrote:As I wrote in my OP, "we're determining the winner of the debate, NOT the winning concept. Pick the one who you think managed to present his arguments in the best and most argumentative way."Pratze wrote:Actually this way no winner can be declared.
I have to post for Knut because realism is important for me. If I don't vote for Knut I am basically saying "i don't care for realism". I also say "I don't care about fun" which is very against what I want to vote for. If I vote for TundraPuppy I am saying "I don't care about realism" which I would never want to be quoted on and "It's all about the fun" (which would perfectly fit on good ballanced realism) but can't be voted because its in the wrong context.
- polihunter
- Newbie
- Posts: 13
- Joined: September 22nd, 2013, 9:14 pm
- Location: Spain
- Contact:
Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner
Mi voto siempre para el realismo, pero también puede ir acompañado de diversión. Caza realismo con diversión, para eso es un juego.
- BCKidd
- Moderator
- Posts: 16557
- Joined: January 6th, 2012, 2:15 am
- Location: British Columbia
- Contact:
Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner
Knut really hit it on the head- my vote is for him. His arguments were concise and well thought out. Peace.
BCKidd.
BCKidd.
"Patience and perseverance, are not an option if you want that trophy, they are a necessity."
Keep it real!
"Careful, David, he's Canadian......They eat people you know." Fletchette.
- RayJRabbit
- Tracker
- Posts: 151
- Joined: February 14th, 2015, 7:10 pm
- Contact:
Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner
How about this. Instead of changing the game, add a camo set that is legendary scent, sight and sound reduction vs all species for those who want the "fun" aspect. Those who want to stay true to real hunting have no need to buy it.
- Dukkers
- Scout
- Posts: 424
- Joined: August 30th, 2014, 3:28 pm
- Contact:
Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner
Been busy in the real world and gone for a while. But God Mode Gear? Have to be careful with the comps then otherwise ok. Both sides did well but I think Knut edged out Tundra Puppy. Now to get a quick hunt in before I have to start building another website for a restaurant.
- jpm1
- Outfitter
- Posts: 2605
- Joined: April 5th, 2014, 8:04 pm
- Location: Dordogne
- Contact:
- Urgia
- Scout
- Posts: 416
- Joined: November 8th, 2013, 7:39 pm
- Contact:
Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner
I smell difficulty levels implementation.
Time to give hardcore players their due.
Time to give hardcore players their due.
- Dillion1111
- Scout
- Posts: 456
- Joined: August 1st, 2014, 12:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Great Debate #1: Realism vs. Fun - Choosing the Winner
I voted for realism,
The game is too phony when you can shoot whole herds of animals with no effort.
The game is too phony when you can shoot whole herds of animals with no effort.
- jpm1
- Outfitter
- Posts: 2605
- Joined: April 5th, 2014, 8:04 pm
- Location: Dordogne
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest