450Ems for one shot. Speaking of Missions.

Kniven · Post by **Kniven** » April 23rd, 2015, 3:41 am

As far I know (don't know whats to come in further missions) I need to pay 450Ems for one shot for the "270 Degree Angle" mission. A bit pricey. My suggestion is to trade my Aimpoint for this one shot. Deal?

FR_Bugs · Post by **FR_Bugs** » April 23rd, 2015, 3:51 am

Hi Kniven
It's a mission so i think ( someone can confirm please ) that if someone kill the deer with this weapon and it's you who harvest it, it count for you.

Kniven · Post by **Kniven** » April 23rd, 2015, 3:58 am

Kniven wrote:As far I know (don't know whats to come in further missions) I need to pay 450Ems for one shot for the "270 Degree Angle" mission. A bit pricey. My suggestion is to trade my Aimpoint for this one shot. Deal?

Yes I can! It has happend before unintentionally. Worth a "shot"

Thanks!

DHRifleman · Post by **DHRifleman** » April 23rd, 2015, 4:14 pm

Would that not be exploiting a known bug?

DonderDeer · Post by **DonderDeer** » April 23rd, 2015, 4:26 pm

Be that as it may, staff have told users who are disgruntled about weapon requirements to use this method. I'd consider it safe.

DHRifleman · Post by **DHRifleman** » April 23rd, 2015, 4:28 pm

So I guess it is no longer a bug if EW has directed players to use it.

Knut · Post by **Knut** » April 23rd, 2015, 6:35 pm

DHRifleman wrote:Would that not be exploiting a known bug?

It would if it would be acknowledged as a bug.

But to my understanding the developers know about it and tolerate this type of actions. Which I actually think is a good thing to do. It supports collaboration within the community and that is in my eyes always beneficial for a game.
I honestly believe it to be a feature, maybe not intentionally implemented, but still meant to be like it is.

For me, bug exploiting is to use something to one's advantage that is obviously or highly likely not working as supposed.

DarkLord · Post by **DarkLord** » April 23rd, 2015, 6:50 pm

It's not a bug, it's a feature.

DHRifleman · Post by **DHRifleman** » April 23rd, 2015, 8:49 pm

If it isn't a bug, then why was it approved and put into the bug section?
http://forum.thehunter.com/viewtopic.php?f=131&t=50835

DonderDeer · Post by **DonderDeer** » April 23rd, 2015, 8:59 pm

Poor communication perhaps.

450Ems for one shot. Speaking of Missions.

450Ems for one shot. Speaking of Missions.

Re: 450Ems for one shot. Speaking of Missions.

Re: 450Ems for one shot. Speaking of Missions.

Re: 450Ems for one shot. Speaking of Missions.

Re: 450Ems for one shot. Speaking of Missions.

Re: 450Ems for one shot. Speaking of Missions.

Re: 450Ems for one shot. Speaking of Missions.

Re: 450Ems for one shot. Speaking of Missions.

Re: 450Ems for one shot. Speaking of Missions.

Re: 450Ems for one shot. Speaking of Missions.

Who is online