I checked the bug section in search of an old bug, that is still there ( http://forum.thehunter.com/viewtopic.php?f=179&t=51959 )
= Flying scope bug.
I noticed in the bug section : http://forum.thehunter.com/viewforum.php?f=179
... that every bug has a "working number"(or whatever this number means) behind it.
The old bug i was searching for has not such a number.
Does it mean that this bug is not under investigation ? Maybe because it's too old ?
Do i have to write a new bug report ?
Numbers behind bugs in bug section
- ChrisMK72
- Outfitter
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: January 9th, 2013, 11:55 am
- Contact:
-
- Master Hunter
- Posts: 9404
- Joined: December 10th, 2011, 7:26 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: Numbers behind bugs in bug section
make a bug report and we will either approve it or disapprove it if it is already documented!ChrisMK72 wrote:I checked the bug section in search of an old bug, that is still there ( http://forum.thehunter.com/viewtopic.php?f=179&t=51959 )
= Flying scope bug.
I noticed in the bug section : http://forum.thehunter.com/viewforum.php?f=179
... that every bug has a "working number"(or whatever this number means) behind it.
The old bug i was searching for has not such a number.
Does it mean that this bug is not under investigation ? Maybe because it's too old ?
Do i have to write a new bug report ?
Feedback on my work as a moderator is always welcome!
- Tod1d
- Lead Moderator
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: June 29th, 2012, 7:13 pm
- Location: 42.655701 N, 82.61936 W
- Contact:
Re: Numbers behind bugs in bug section
[2731]
It was probably reported before we started adding the bug numbers to the topics. Or we just somehow missed it.
By all rights, if you make a new bug report it should be "Disapproved" as a duplicate. Unless you can add new information that will help solve it.
In this case, I think the solution is pretty obvious. The mounting point for that scope needs to be moved a bit.
It was probably reported before we started adding the bug numbers to the topics. Or we just somehow missed it.
By all rights, if you make a new bug report it should be "Disapproved" as a duplicate. Unless you can add new information that will help solve it.
In this case, I think the solution is pretty obvious. The mounting point for that scope needs to be moved a bit.
It's "Tod", with one bloody 'd'!
- ChrisMK72
- Outfitter
- Posts: 3028
- Joined: January 9th, 2013, 11:55 am
- Contact:
Re: Numbers behind bugs in bug section
Tod1d wrote:[2731]
It was probably reported before we started adding the bug numbers to the topics. Or we just somehow missed it.
By all rights, if you make a new bug report it should be "Disapproved" as a duplicate. Unless you can add new information that will help solve it.
In this case, I think the solution is pretty obvious. The mounting point for that scope needs to be moved a bit.
Ok, thx Tod1d. Now i understand this system.
So it doesn't make sense to write something about this bug, unless new information can be given.
I just was afraid that nothing will be done about this bug, cause i thought without numbers nothing will be done.
Big thx for clarification !!!!
- Tod1d
- Lead Moderator
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: June 29th, 2012, 7:13 pm
- Location: 42.655701 N, 82.61936 W
- Contact:
Re: Numbers behind bugs in bug section
No troubles. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.
Be Well
Be Well
It's "Tod", with one bloody 'd'!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest