outrider wrote:caledonianblues wrote:
The wolf sounds like an exciting addition to the game. I'm relieved to hear that their behaviour isn't being based on that portrayed in The Grey. Making them aggressive would have been a step in the wrong direction, in my opinion. Looking forward to seeing and hunting them.
i agree, the wolves don't need to be aggressive . as i stated in another post, "theHunter seems to becoming theHunted"..aggressive animals ruin my nice, peaceful, relaxing hunting...
What is wrong with you Guys?
So we don't get wolves like in "The Grey". Sounds like we gonna Get "Dancing With Wolves" instead.
And what excitement value is entailed here?
Another Coyote or Fox derivative. Squeak, wait and shoot.
But hey, maybe you can try sitting on a rock in the sun watching the social behavior of a wolf pack. Nice, peaceful, relaxing hunting? Come on ..
Try watching the National Geographic nature series.
David Attenborough has done animal families to death.
I can live with that provided the numbers are kept low enough to reflect the size of the reserve and it is appreciated that individual wolf packs do not interact in a peaceful way within their established territories.
Maybe we will see a good dog fight now and then.
On a reserve this size there is really only room for one pack of wolves. At most a North and a South pack of ten or twelve just to keep you wolf watchers happy.
Any more would be an unrealistic strain on the available food resources.( The unproportionately high numbers of bears adds to that problem already.)
Old hunters never die.They just sit around the campfires and tell the biggest lies.